Where to deconfine? | The Press

Henri Ouellette-Vezina
The Press

“It will not be the open bar, we are still far from that, people have to understand that we still have a month and a half easily where we will have to be very vigilant. But by being careful, I think we can start a return to normal life, ”launches the D^re Marie-Pascale Pomey, public policy specialist at the School of Public Health of the University of Montreal (ESPUM).

Monday, The Press reported that Quebec was preparing to give the green light to the resumption of sports activities for young people on January 31, the day when it also plans to allow the reopening of restaurant dining rooms and limited gatherings in homes.

The D^re Pomey observes, like most experts in the world, that a reduction in transmission is observed, but above all, that the world is “slowly moving from a conception of a pandemic towards an endemic”, which is defined by the presence “usual” of a virus in a population.

An idea of ​​the sequence

In this context, it seems “safe” to reopen several parts of society, according to M^me Pomey, citing in particular cinemas, performance halls – “which have shown their ability to respect the rules very well” -, but also restaurants, with “strict conditions” and “good ventilation”.

“The opening of restaurants, in my opinion, could have already been announced, given that the peak has been reached. With a lower capacity, around 50%, by asking that people be vaccinated and that they understand that a table equals a residence, I do not see where the problem is, ”slips virologist Benoit Barbeau, professor in the department. of Biological Sciences from the University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM).

The same precautionary principle should apply for the resumption of sports and extracurricular activities, judges the expert.

Both M^me Pomey that Mr. Barbeau also agree on the fact that it seems legitimate to propose more “openness” in terms of private gatherings, in order to allow Quebecers to meet in “at least more than one residence in the same place”, ideally between vaccinated people. “For the moment, I would unfortunately leave aside gyms and bars, where the risks are still a little higher,” says Benoit Barbeau, however.

“Go Somewhere”

For the president of the Association of specialists in emergency medicine of Quebec (ASMUQ), the D^r Gilbert Boucher, the government’s challenge will be to “find a fair balance” in a context where “there is still a lot of community transmission” and that “the wave is unfortunately not over”.

“Hospitalizations are going down and we are very happy, but it is certain that the pressure on the system has not disappeared. At the same time, we must not wait until our hospitals are empty, otherwise we will spend six months confined. We have to go back somewhere, ”adds the D^r Boucher.

One thing remains inevitable: each deconfinement “is associated with a little more transmission”, he continues.

However, this balance will not be “really not easy to identify”, believes Alain Lamarre, professor-researcher specializing in immunology and virology at the National Institute for Scientific Research (INRS). “The main thing will be that we give ourselves a game of at least two weeks between each relief, in order to really assess the impact and not have to sink into the concrete of promises. We must also immediately put all that in parentheses, saying that if we don’t see a marked increase, we can lighten something else, ”he says. Like many, the expert is concerned about the erosion of adherence to health measures. “The government has to deal with this. If they keep the tone too hard as is the case at the moment, it will cause too many to drop out, ”he concludes.