A conspiratorial mother for whom vaccination is a “crime against humanity” has lost part of her parental authority over her children, so that the father will be able to have them vaccinated.
“Madame can believe what she wants, the court prefers to follow the recommendations of public health”, decided judge Steve J. Reimnitz in dismissing the mother recently at the Drummondville courthouse.
The mother, who cannot be named to protect the identity of her 9- and 14-year-old daughters, is a conspirator who believes the COVID-19 vaccine contains an ‘ID chip’, or that ‘it is made from cells of aborted fetuses.
These claims are false, but the woman seems to firmly believe in them due to videos found on the internet.
And that is why she strongly opposes the vaccination of her children, of whom she does not have custody.
“She claims that the proposed vaccine is an ‘experimental injection’ which can render her daughter sterile, noted the judge.
Thus, the father had no choice but to go to court, requesting that the mother be deprived of her parental authority in matters of health.
interest of children
He argued in evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are approved for children 5 years of age and older, and that the National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommends vaccination in children.
Faced with these two diametrically opposed positions, the judge finally ruled in favor of the father.
“It is in the best interests of the children of the parties to be protected as soon as possible by the administration of the vaccine proposed by the public health authorities,” he concluded.
It should be noted that since the start of the pandemic, the courts have systematically ruled in favor of vaccination. And when a parent goes to court, the file is given priority. In this case, the father waited less than two weeks before obtaining a favorable decision.
See also